Was the colllapse of Muammar Qaddafi's dictatorship caused by the Essay

Was the colllapse of Muammar Qaddafi's dictatorship caused by the western world, because of the benefits they would aquire from - Essay Example However, on a closer scrutiny of the same footage, and that which lies behind the same, one can start making a discovery of an anomalous tale that casts a rather unflattering light on a number of the elites in both American and British (Western world) establishments. Over these four decades reign, different individuals from the Western world got mixed up, in one way or the other, with Gaddafi and his form of leadership. There are those who were solely in pursuit of his money and as thus not only flattered, but also sneaked to him since they were pursuing friendship with him. On the other hand, there are those (and this formed the larger group) who saw him as their enemy. The latte even went a step further to avails their resources in turning Gaddafi into assort of a 2-dimensional cartoon-like worldwide villain (Curtis 1). Those who had taken active roles in ensuring that Gaddafi's leadership crumbles were not solely politicians, but also included spies and journalists from such agenc ies as M16 and CIA, public relations (PR) firms, members of Washington think tanks, humanitarian intervention philosophers, leaders of the IRA, academics and posh left wing revolutionaries. All these groups had varied aims and this made them use this African leader in different ways. Seemingly, almost all these groups were in fear in the sense that both power and influence were slipping away from them in a hurried manner and that they were hardly certain of what was to happen next. However, this paper is geared toward availing an in-depth understanding of how the Western world had instigated the collapse of Muammar's dictatorship and how the West would benefit from the same (Watson 1). Introduction Majority of the claims from the Western world have actually painted Muammar Gaddafi to be among the evil individuals to have ever existed. On the contrary however, and in my view, Gaddafi might not have been such evil. History has it that having been at some point a poor nomad, Gaddafi ro se up strongly to overthrow a characteristically vicious pedophilic monarch. Additionally, he did fight for the rights of the poor as well as women in the Libyan society. In a global view, Muammar was on the forefront in fighting for the rights of the African continent against Western Imperialism (Roberts 1). It is even arguable that were it not for the Western propaganda machine- commonly known as the media- the accomplishments this African persona had made would have earned himself great prize including the Nobel Peace Prize, thus positioning him among the greatest leaders of the world of the century that has already had its sun setting. It is only that the media could hardly talk of the good things that Gaddafi had done, like being the very first head of state in the African continent to craft the very first true contemporary democracy as contrasted to a majority of the fake democracy representations in many other countries. Unlike the quoted democracy in nations, where only thos e with political say and the banks have the power and not the people, the Libyans truly had the power bestowed upon them. Muammar's Libya possessed a democracy superior to most of the countries in the world and this was annoying to almost all the Western nations- which could hardly bear the thought of a third world country having superior political system than that of their own. If dictatorship was anything to go by,